The evidence that these so-called brothels exist appears to be a single quote from a state animal protection officer named Madeleine Martin. The Daily Mail's claim that "animal brothels" were operating in Germany in 2013 may also be an exaggeration. It was the final legislative hurdle for a bill the lower house passed in December.Ī German court also upheld the country's ban on bestiality after a 2016 legal challenge. Germany’s upper house of Parliament, the Bundesrat, voted Friday to criminalize for the first time “using an animal for personal sexual activities” and to punish offenders with fines of as much as $34,000. This article made no mention of migrants being a cause of this problem and the bestiality loophole was closed in 2013 as German lawmakers voted to criminalize "using an animal for personal sexual activities": The Daily Mail published an article claiming that some animal brothels, or erotic zoos, had opened in Germany after people realized that the country's animal protection laws didn't explicitly ban sex with animals. These two articles are not related, and the information in the Daily Mail article is both exaggerated and outdated. This article cites two stories in its attempt to connect these two supposed phenomena: A 2013 Daily Mail report about lax animal protection laws, and a 2017 Reuters article about Germany's migrant population.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |